We are all critics. We evaluate and opinions much or little knowledge about a particular topic. Of all the criticism, film criticism should be the most universal and democratic. Anyone who has ranted be viewing a movie once a withering statement that basically limited to two words: "good" or "bad." The vast majority of viewers is unable to support his opinion of value, but they are driven by choice, if the 'stripping' I did have a good time and did not find it soporific or unintelligible. The common eye is educated by the master of Hollywood blockbuster, cinema applying an effective formula for escapism and entertainment, which is not always negative and when fresh, original and plagiarist or repetitive. Anyone can have an opinion on this or that tape, but few are in the capacity to develop a critique. To evaluate a film one must be a movie buff, that is, to know much about film, know a bit of argument, semiotics and aesthetics. Now, not only possess sufficient knowledge of cinema, you have to know translate them. Film criticism is the analysis of a film. In some universities teach courses Seventh Art Appreciation but get you nowhere cinemero critic. Just do not study for that. Many journalists specializing in the art by simple hobby and not have picked a fucking camera in their life. Film critic may seem like a bilious subject negligible. A poison that oozes offensive vectors driven by envy. A victim of criticism once said that: every critic is a frustrated artist . Whether true or not, that is mean or not, the film critic is a necessary evil as long as their judgments are made with responsibility and fairness concerning (because few things as subjective as a criticism that always comes from a point of view). The sound analysis is used to guide and educate, survive over time and can become a source of consultation for future generations.
Film criticism was not born with cinema. It was developed as the cinema was becoming artistic value. In 1927 he established the first prize award winning film, eventually called Oscar and although sometimes his choices are questionable, is to date a paradigm for evaluating cinemeras productions. However, experts rely more on the juries of festivals such as Cannes, Venice or Berlin at the Academy.
In the golden age of American cinema came the sharp pens and demolition of various critics. Underlined by Hedda Hopper and Louella Parsons who curiously hated each other because both were classified as 'the queen of Hollywood' (see telefilm Malice in Wonderland Trikonis Gus Elizabeth Taylor and Jane Alexander). In all honesty, maybe aunts did not know a lot of movies and a lot of entertainment to Magaly Medina was so much malice in his comments. The Hopper for example, was an actress who made many films but never had a leading role, hence the comment with bad milk.
In the postwar years, the analysis becomes more academic film. Under the influence of André Bazin, perhaps the most important theorist of film, a group of young editors of the magazine Cahiers du Cinema stopped making the role of carping and encouraged to make films: Jacques Rivette, François Truffaut, Jean-Luc Godard and Claude Chabrol (who just he died a few hours of writing.) Another example of critical condition after American film director Peter Bogdanovich is who debuted with the excellent The Last Movie.
In Peru, the criticism has been exercised by various print media, then radio and television. The first major film magazine was Hablemos de Cine within the University of Lima which brought, among others, Isaac León, Juan and Jose Carlos Huayhuaca Bullitt, the latter were encouraged to make a handful of films and the occasional television production. In later years other magazines circulated as The Great Illusion, armchair and most recently San Marcos Godard! , led by a generation of young moviegoers who like the old face critics who often believe that the analysis is cinemero unique heritage in this country. Television has given way to programs like The pleasure of the eyes , led by Ricardo Bedoya (perhaps our best critic) and Cinescape Bruno Pinasco, although the latter has more than show-business and very little discretion.
Luck blockbuster of a film is in many countries of criticism. Fortunately for some bad movies in Peru viewers ignore the opinions of knowledgeable and conscientious can become a box office success. Curiously, the film enjoyed good reviews can not stand even a week in theaters. Critical and not always go hand in hand because as the old adage: The view is like ass, we all have a .
0 comments:
Post a Comment