Chaos Black Gamesharks

TOUCH ME LIKE YOU PACK

a tod @ s;
John Tyner became famous thanks to the famous phrase uttered in an American airport when he went to be cached "As I touch the package, denounce you."
John Tyner decided to be cached instead of going through the airport scanner, which I did not know that this phrase would travel the world and has spread alarm among the passengers, calling for a boycott against American security measures at airports.
There are cases of searches so humiliating that have caused great astonishment in the U.S.. One flight attendant was forced to remove her breast implants in a body search. In Internet
hung scaneres hundred photos taken of travelers, and travelers do not believe that the rays of the scaneres not harmful to health.

What is true that these security measures have curtailed freedoms and there are American companies are lining thanks to the happy Antiterra scaneres and measures.
I leave a video format
Greetings
humor.

Butler Man And A Woman Painting

political documentary

The documentary film genre is the oldest, but paradoxically also one of the least popular. It started with the film when brothers Louis and Auguste Lumière recorded output of the factory workers or The arrival of a train to . The inventors of the cinema at the time did not understand the usefulness of the image. The development of language come from the hand of other filmmakers. While it continued to make documentaries or registering political events, social or sporting activities, the foundations of the genre's established filmmaker like Robert Flaherty with Nanook of the North (1922) and Dziga Vertov with Chelovek s Kinno-apparatom (1929) (1), making everyone in a school, an aspect of how to represent the reality on the big screen.

documentary film is called taking or recorded images of reality around us everyday stories that we see from many points of view-manipulation handles the director. There are many ways to present the "life itself" so that viewers often wonder how much is fiction in a documentary film and how much there is in fiction.

Documentaries most popular are those with educational or entertainment purposes, show the nature, landscapes or cities as tourist destinations (2). Less popular and are restricted view documentaries with political content, transmitters and violators of ideologies, which by nature are uncomfortable in the circles of power. The first was the Soviet political documentary. Lenin and then Stalin saw the film the potential for mass indoctrination basically ignorant and often illiterate. Goebbels foresaw the same power of seduction of the image and promoted the career of Leni Riefenstahl documentary (3). The first political documentary not covered by an autocratic regime was the Dutchman Joris Ivens who drew attention with her short Regen (1929) (4).

Recognized fiction filmmakers have ventured into the film. Sergei Eisenstein with Que viva Mexico! (1932). Luis Buñuel with Hurdes, land without bread (1933). John Ford during World War II. Glauber Rocha during the Rose Revolution in Portugal (5). Other renowned names such as Jean-Luc Godard to Martin Scorsese or are added to the list.

In this century, and the Oscar for Best Documentary for Bowling for Columbine (2002) by Michael Moore (6), gender unfairly delayed getting some more ground. The librarian of today assumes a role of complainant. System blasts accusing the groups of power to destroy the planet environmentally, to undermine the morale of society, organized crime and mismanagement, the exaggerated cult of Capital as the supreme good. The political documentary uncomfortable and it becomes a voice of protest in the midst of a silent ocean where communication is subject to advertising budget.

films with political content should be compulsory viewing. Some of them should generate discussions and roundtables. Raising awareness of people and make them take an ideological stance that unfortunately neoliberal wave has been sluggish. To this end, the faculty of Humanities at the Universidad Privada del Norte, organized in the last days of November is an example of political documentary cinema, with the intention of raising awareness of the fierce and unkind side of globalization. Images are hard to us to reflect and alert us to the morass in which we are submerged. The titles of the cycle are: The Corporation (2004) Marck Achbar & Jennifer Abbot , Mondovino (2004) by Jonathan Nossiter, Le cauchemar Darwin (2004) by Hubert Sauper, Nos amis of banque (1997) by Peter Chappell A Decent Factory (2005) by Thomas Balmes, Ouvrière du monde (2000) by Marie-France Collard and Le Banque des Humbles (2000) of Armirul Arham.

(1) Chelovek s Kinno-apparatom is the most famous documentary Vertov, but not the first. Since 1919 had been making experimental short films where rupture would refine his style of filmmaking. (2) Walter Ruttman did in 1927 Berlin - Die Symphonie der Grossstadt , film inspired by the experimental work made by Vertov, giving a peculiar vision of how life a day in the German capital. (3) According to gossip at the time, Goebbels and Riefenstahl were lovers and that's why he chose to become the official director of the Third Reich. Despite its ideological virulence, Riefenstahl's documentaries are highly valued for their aesthetic beauty. (4) Ivens was a consummate Communist, ideological affiliation is reflected in all his movies (5) Following the triumph of the Cuban revolution, Latin America appeared in several documentary inzqueirda committed to being perhaps the most important films Time furnace Pino Solanas and The Battle of Chile Patricio Guzman. (6) Moore received an Oscar for the four days of the U.S. invasion of Iraq and issued a series of memorable tirade against Bush and his cronies. From that day on freedom of expression was suppressed in USA. Entertainment emissions are no longer "live" but are transmitted with five to ten seconds of delay to avoid a repeat of the incident. Two years after Moore received the Palme d'Or at Cannes for Fahrenheit 9 / 11 .

Coffee How Much Cream And Sugar?

denounces killing of dolphins CALDERONES

Hello everybody s;
I have sent an email with some very unpleasant pictures, the intention of the person who sent me is you see reflected this barbarism in my humble blog.
I'm just going to put the photo you see just below, of all the pictures sent this, is less strong.
That red is not due to the algae dyed water is the blood of hundreds of pilot whales are slaughtered on the coast of the Faroe Islands in Denmark.
These animals come every year to these shores and younger people, kill them with machetes on the beach and so demonstrate that they are men (AMAZING !!!).

awful thing here is, apparently no one does anything to stop the annual slaughter.

speaking with an acquaintance of the subject, I told him that it seemed impossible that a developed country like Denmark, there were these things and that its inhabitants seem normal, and also that day was a national holiday.
and answer me.
- In theory Spain is also a developed country, they kill bulls and its inhabitants seems normal and it is a national holiday. Greetings

Blaupunkt Model Of Chevrolet Optra

Hello everybody s;
Towards a season that did not write anything on the blog and now not to write. The truth is I've been on vacation a season by a fantastic trip. Once home
you realize that in three weeks a lot has happened in the world. I've been off, I needed and I have to update.
to start anyway, I leave a video of humor who has starred a friend of mine, is a champion, not afraid of anything or anyone.
Be patient and wait until the end of the video.

Greetings.

Women Stomach Sitting Women

my vote irresponsible

In Peru, political parties are a kind of movement that people coalesce around a leader, call Pardo, Pierola Odría, etc. With the passing of the leader, the party's popularity wanes and soon fades. APRA has been the only exception. Alan knew how to take the post of Hague. Popular Action Christian People's Party survive, but its political involvement weakens with each electoral setback. All matches are born with an ideological position that will eventually mixing or adultery to become unrecognizable. Beech thought virtually nothing remains within the APRA. The ideal of free bread does not match the laws of free market.

liberal in the world do not fit the extreme positions. Neither the ultra fascism or radical communism. All nations are forced to climb on the train of globalization economically or else be overwhelmed by the system. Den Xiaoping left China with a communist to become a voracious giant eager to engulf the entire capital of the world. If you use Maoism is to ensure cheap labor to multinational corporations. The same is true in Vietnam and Indonesia. Cuba's romance with communism is about to collapse and probably the dynasty of Kim Il Sung in North Korea. Positions as Chávez's nationalism can not be taken seriously, especially in Venezuela there are many factories of foreign companies and 47% of its oil production is acquired by the United States, supposedly their main enemy.

With the exception of the Peruvian Revolution de Velasco, the left in Peru, through Mariategui Rabines Hague and has been a belch of poor significance. An outbreak of violence in the most extreme cases or an association of opportunistic extortionists. Electorally never had anything important, except the mayor of Lima with Barrantes, who was far from being a national leader size.

Although sympathetic to the socialist utopia, I've never voted for a leftist candidate. Except Javier Diez Canseco, no intellectual aspect that has me convinced. Most of the time I paid or right-leaning candidates. My vote in the municipal and presidential elections is for the person, not by their promises, I doubt government plans to comply. The first condition requires a candidate is honesty and (median) transparency. Second, capacity and leadership. Third, respect and willingness to talk. I've always voted for the loser because the candidate never managed to win my sympathies. I could never get in tune with the popular clamor.

If I had the opportunity to vote in 1980 and 1985, would have done by Bedoya, a Peruvian politician has led me more empathy. Perhaps if economists had been president not call the eighties lost decade. In 1990 Vargas Llosa would have voted for if the APRA no stopping me. Many of my generation, with eighteen years of age, we are not allowed to vote (a vote that would have been largely speculated vargasllosiano) and we could just get their voter registration after the race.

in 1995 was my first presidential vote (not my first vote was to elect the Constituent Assembly of 1992). I should vote for Perez de Cuellar, Peru illustrate that Fujimori was the alternative, but voted for Belmont that I liked at the time (little to do with the old entrenched today softened his channel.) In 2000, voted for Toledo in the first and second round, ignoring his request to vote flawed. In 2001, I voted for Lourdes in the first and second foul. At the end Toledo narrowly beat Alan and made the best government since democracy returned in 1980.

In 2006, I went to vote for Alan Lourdes and stole to table their best chance of becoming president. The second round then became a choice of lesser evil, an apocalyptic struggle for some, including Vargas Llosa one was talking about AIDS and other terminal cancer. According to my principles I had no choice, had to vote for Ollanta despite its facade of gross cop. This decision cost me the boos course 90% of my family and friends. In the two months between the first and second rounds, I was branded as ignorant , irresponsible, putting at risk the future of my son (who was born a few weeks ago.) In my social environment, Ollanta represented a return to the caves, the puppet of Chavez, the bogeyman of foreign investment (the panacea for our country), the expropriating enterprises and housing, the demon that send less than a year to hell with the nation's economy. For them, thinking vote was for Alan, for me to vote for him was to endorse the corruption of his first government, was to reward excessive immorality and greater disability that records our republican history. Beatify was a bunch of robbers led by a rogue seven soles as Chavez called him, and I had not dock (or holdup yet).

As I argued above, the first requirement for voting for a candidate is to have clean hands and in my perception is Lifebuoy Ollanta beside Alan, therefore, vote for Ollanta in the background was not a vote for him but against Alan and company (which I give so much disgust as Chirinos Soto with his face poto). And, of course, I evaluated the effect vaunted apocalyptic supported by his detractors. First, I never heard from his own mouth or expropriate any threat to march against private investment, spoke of tax regulation and protection for employees, that sort to be intimidated with unemployment so that it becomes productive. Second, I believe in the strength of democracy, if Ollanta had tried running and ultra radical measures should be taken to close the Parliament because he had no majority, manipulate the judiciary, expropriate the press, have the support of the armed forces (where Humala are not seen with good eyes) and with the support of the United States has many geopolitical interests in our country, conjunction unlikely. If Fujimori's coup was successful was because the Armed Forces, United States, a large sector of judges and the press supported him. Five years ago, Alan wanted to nationalize the bank had a parliamentary majority and bipolarized world stage and yet still failed. Ollanta is a guy with enough intelligence to know that radicalism is the suicide of his regime so I presume that his government would run at most some social reforms (which are necessary) and maybe some vulgar extravagance. Nothing apocalyptic. Perhaps the government would have been better than Alan, whose coffers are filled with both selling out but is unable to lift such Ica area of \u200b\u200bthe rubble after an earthquake three years ago (the earthquake earlier this year in Rancagua and Concepcion was worse and the Chileans and are rising).

Giving an overview oteada the election of 2011 would not vote for Keiko would endorse the mafia because of his father. Nor by Castaneda because I see little transparency. For Ollanta either, my vote was circumstantial, as I see it as a cop. Neither the Father Arana as much as I will be sympathetic to the Liberation Theology. The Aráoz me APRA is nice but not, his candidacy is just to add seats in parliament of those good for nothing. Maybe vote for Toledo, but it is more likely to vote irresponsibly by Guerra García Social Force, to be a little sluggish consistent with the socialist in me. Chile had a Bachelet, Lula and Brazil now Dilma Rousseff, Argentina, the binomial Kirshnner and there was not alarmist apocalyptic are no such countries (not that I know of Evo in Bolivia, Ecuador's Correa went ahead after police strike and Chávez's Venezuela itself.) My question is why the XXI Century Socialism in Peru should be different from those of its neighbors.